Search for: "Rummel, Klepper "
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2022, 10:14 am
In Rummel Klepper & Kahl, LLP v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 7:05 am
The matter went up on appeal to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals where the Appeals Court considered the summary judgment granted to the defendant Rummel, Klepper & Kahl (“RKK”) based upon what came down to a contributory negligence reading of the indemnity clause that was allowed to survive in the first district court opinion relating to these ambiguous contracts finding that English was negligent so couldn’t recover. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 7:20 am
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP et al., allowed a breach of contract and indemnity claim to move forward despite the fact that conflicting term sheets between the plaintiff and defendant could have been read to violate Virginia law by requiring indemnity for English’s own negligence. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 6:58 am
Rummel Klepper & Kahl, LLP, 451 Md. 600, 610 (2017). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:43 am
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP et al In this case, English, a general contractor, entered into a contract for Quality Assurance (QA) functions with RK&K, the defendant, on a contract English entered into with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:43 am
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP et al In this case, English, a general contractor, entered into a contract for Quality Assurance (QA) functions with RK&K, the defendant, on a contract English entered into with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Rummel Klepper & Kahl, LLP serves as a strong reminder that you always have to be aware of the applicable laws in a jurisdiction when negotiating terms, and protecting your rights on a new project. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Rummel Klepper & Kahl, LLP serves as a strong reminder that you always have to be aware of the applicable laws in a jurisdiction when negotiating terms, and protecting your rights on a new project. [read post]
